Dear Lord, in this world of palpable evil, give all people of goodwill the wisdom, the courage, and the means to resist and overcome it.
Read the rest, by Ira Katz, here.
Dear Lord, in this world of palpable evil, give all people of goodwill the wisdom, the courage, and the means to resist and overcome it.
Read the rest, by Ira Katz, here.
Article by Gary D. Barnett.
He starts it off with a quote from Edward Bernays‘ 1928 book ‘Propaganda‘, in which he writes:
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.“
(Bernays, by the way, was a nephew of Sigmund Freud.)
Then, in his own article, Barnett writes:
For most, it is a struggle to just get up and face the day, or at least that is the case for a majority of the population. Because of that, most choose to hide from reality in order to satisfy a dream-state, instead of facing the truth. It is as if the entirety of this population is in a mind-control experiment, and are being hypnotized to accept their own slavery as the best option. AI, if allowed to take over society, can accomplish that designed outcome, just as is sought by the oligarchs.
He ends his article with these words:
This reality is not accidental, it has been purposely created in order to capture the psyche of the majority. Something is greatly amiss here, as so many of this population have effectively given up on actual life in favor of a State-structured life based on fraudulent perception as a way of escaping what is real. This is terribly disturbing, as the last thing needed at this time is a country full of obedient zombies. This makes me wonder if the “Invasion of the Body Snatchers,” was simply a prescient preview of things to come.
“Is there any point in public debate in a society where hardly anyone has been taught how to think, while millions have been taught what to think?”
Article by Juan Fernando Carpio.
Tom Woods interviews the author of this new book.
From the video description:
Jeff Fynn-Paul discusses the controversial questions surrounding European exploration and settlement in the new world: did they steal the land? Were they racist? Were they “anti-Indian”? Did they commit genocide? And many others.
Article by Anthony Watts.
6-minute video by “10MinuteTop5”
Article by Chris Morrison, from The Daily Sceptic.
Video by Stuart Robinson, who writes:
If you’re a fan of ‘Watership Down’ then I hope you’ll find this film very interesting. It’s the 50th anniversary of the first publication of ‘Watership Down’ in November 2022 so I’m sharing this documentary that I filmed with Richard Adams ten years ago. In a series of interviews Richard talks about his life and times, revealing his passions, influences and experiences that led him to write his famous novel. Happy viewing, thanks Stuart.
3-minute video here.
Article by Sebastian Wang.
Excerpt:
Keynes: Misused, Misunderstood, and Weaponised
Austro-libertarians often reject Keynes outright. But fairness demands a distinction between Keynes’s actual theory and what has been done in his name.
Keynes did not advocate permanent deficits or chronic inflation. His argument was specific: when private demand collapses as a result of previous political or banking mistakes, the state may need to support employment temporarily until confidence returns. He believed that deficits should occur in recessions, and budget surpluses should follow in recoveries. His famous dictum was clear:
“The boom, not the slump, is the right time for austerity.”
Nothing in that sentence resembles the behaviour of modern governments.
The post-war political class discovered that Keynesian rhetoric provided a moral cover for something they already wanted to do—spend without restraint. They kept the deficits but abandoned the surpluses. They celebrated “stimulus” and ignored discipline. And so Keynes’s emergency prescription became an open-ended licence for irresponsibility.
The tragedy is that Keynes wanted to stabilise capitalism. His followers hollowed it out.
The Unholy Synthesis: Politics, Banking, and the Illusion of Wealth
By the late twentieth century, the system had settled into a stable pattern:
It is a mutually reinforcing cycle. The state gets cheap debt. Banks get profitable leverage. Voters get rising house prices. And the economy absorbs wave after wave of malinvestment.
But the structure is inherently unstable. It requires ever-growing debt to sustain the illusion. It cannot tolerate honest interest rates. It collapses if credit contracts. It accumulates imbalances so large that no democratic government can address them openly without committing political suicide.
This is not capitalism. It is a form of monetary serfdom disguised as modernity.
Why the System Cannot Reform Itself
Reform would require at least three impossible acts:
No such coalition exists. Every attempt at reform triggers electoral revolt. Every crisis invites a new round of emergency interventions that further entrench the existing machinery. The conclusion is harsh but unavoidable: The current monetary order cannot be reformed. It can only fail.
It would seem to us like liberation, says Gary North in this article from 2005.