Dear Lord, in this world of palpable evil, give all people of goodwill the wisdom, the courage, and the means to resist and overcome it.
Read the rest, by Ira Katz, here.
Dear Lord, in this world of palpable evil, give all people of goodwill the wisdom, the courage, and the means to resist and overcome it.
Read the rest, by Ira Katz, here.
Article by Gary North.
Excerpt:
I believe in decentralized political authority. I believe that governments are more responsive to voters at the local level than they are at the state or national level. But I also believe that the transfer of economic authority in the form of private property, especially the ownership of gold or silver coins, is more important for the preservation of liberty than the transfer of political sovereignty back to local units of civil government.
People are more careful about spending their money than they are about voting. They spend their money constantly. They vote only occasionally. They spend their money on aspects of their lives that they are closely familiar with. They are barely familiar with local politicians.
So, with respect to that crucial resource, knowledge, it is more important to decentralize ownership than it is to decentralize political power. They both should be decentralized, but if local voters do not have authority over the monetary system, by means of a gold coin standard, their right to vote locally will be compromised politically. The major decisions will still be made by the central government.
Article by Gary North (from 2019).
This is the heart of the nonsense. He is making a huge conceptual mistake. He is implicitly equating empire and civilization. They are not the same.
Video by ‘The Archivist’s Journal’ (7 minutes)
From the transcript:
Joseph Tanter is a historian who’s pretty much spent his whole career trying to identify how all this went down. And he landed on what he calls diminishing returns on complexity.
Every problem Rome faced, they solved by adding something. More soldiers, more administrators, more subsidies, more regulations. Each solution worked, but each one also added a permanent cost. And once you build those systems, you can’t really walk them back. You can’t cancel grain subsidies without riots. You can’t cut the army without losing territory. So, the machine just keeps getting bigger and more expensive every year. And eventually, the cost of maintaining it outpaces what it can produce.
Gary North disagrees.
Interview with James Taylor, president of the Heartland Institute.
From the video description:
We cover the “97% consensus” playbook and why alarmists stopped debating the facts, why today’s temperatures are still unusually cold compared to most of the last 6,000 years of human civilization, and why recovering from the Little Ice Age is good news, not a crisis. Plus:
Video (8 minutes) by ‘Bygone Philosophy’.
Article by Lily Johnson.
Note in particular point 3: ‘Its city-states allowed art and new ideas to flourish’
Quote: ‘The Medici family had a huge hand in the explosion of arts and culture that occurred in their city, leading Florence to be widely considered the home of the Renaissance itself. Founding the eminent Medici Bank in 1397, the family became valuable patrons to some of the country’s greatest artists.’
That’s just a few decades after the Black Death, which made individuals (those who had survived) much more valuable, thus starting ‘individualism’.
BTW here’s the AI answer:
The Renaissance began in Italy primarily due to the region’s unprecedented wealth from Mediterranean trade, its direct physical connection to the legacy of Ancient Rome, and a competitive political structure of independent city-states.
Steve Koonin gives a talk at the ARC conference.
Some guy refutes what Koonin says, to some degree, here.
What the second guy does not refer to is Koonin’s description of how things get ‘blown up’ from science report, to IPCC summaries, to media reports. He also does not refer to the huge increase in young people’s mental health problems caused by climate change apocalyptic talk.
Video (with Piers Morgan) here.
Article by J.B. Shurk.
Excerpt:
Are all cultures equally worthy of our respect? Globalists say, “yes.”
Are all religions equally worthy of our respect? Globalists say, “yes.”
Are all nations equally worthy of our respect? Globalists say, “yes.”
Globalists speak of “multiculturalism” as if it were a virtue and equate Western civilization with “white supremacy,” “patriarchy,” and “imperialism.” They believe Christians should celebrate Islamic holidays. They believe national borders are “racist.” They believe that anybody who rejects globalism promotes “hate.”
Article by Charles Burris. (With lots of links to other texts/books.)