Sean McDowell interviews Stephen Meyer.
Mention of someone who said that, after all insights, he still didn’t want it to be true. (At about 11 min.)
Sean McDowell interviews Stephen Meyer.
Mention of someone who said that, after all insights, he still didn’t want it to be true. (At about 11 min.)
Video here. (1 h 4 m.)
Summary by Grok:
Summary of Hugh Ross Q&A Transcript (Reasons to Believe Event)
Dr. Hugh Ross fields audience questions on science-faith intersections, defending an old-earth creationist view (progressive creation with long creation “days”) that integrates biblical theology with scientific evidence. Key points:
Overall Tone: Ross emphasizes harmony between Scripture (“book of revelation”) and nature (“book of creation”), God’s purposeful design, and resources (books like Navigating Genesis, More Than a Theory, Hidden Treasures in the Book of Job). He encourages evangelism, notes scientific confirmation of biblical patterns, and stresses humanity’s role in managing Earth. The session promotes thoughtful integration over conflict, with plugs for RTB materials.
Video of interview of Hugh Ross by Eric Metaxas.
37-minute video here.
See also this 3-hour podcast ‘EXPOSED: Hollywood Intentionally Destroys Spiritual Themes in Modern Films | Rob Ager’
Where the interviewee says that the vision many of the scientists interviewed for ‘2001’ seemed to have is that a god-like entity will emerge from the intelligent beings evolving in the universe. It won’t be a God that created the universe, but a God that takes control of the universe.
Which is more or less exactly how Gary North interprets the materialistic-evolutionary mindset: Out of chaos came order (despite entropy) and as soon as intelligence emerged, it ‘legitimately’ starts ‘guiding’ and ‘controlling’ evolution to serve its purposes.
No different from the ‘might makes right’ attitude actually.
Talk by Dr. Hugh Ross.
“Dr. Hugh Ross discusses recent cosmic discoveries and their implications for our understanding of God’s creation in this seminar.”
Says astronomer Hugh Ross here. (44 minutes)
9-minute excerpt of an interview with Hugh Ross.
Starts here.
Includes account of when he visited the Soviet Union. He says scientists there were researching “occult weapons”, because the leadership realised they were falling behind the US and were getting desperate.
He says some of the scientists there were “obviously demon-possessed”, and explained that in terms of their behaviour: Shouting at him during his talk, being very hostile, turning away, going into foetal position etc.
Here it is.
Alternatively, here. Under this video on rumble.com we find the following text:
This film exposes the climate alarm as an invented scare without any basis in science. It shows that mainstream studies and official data do not support the claim that we are witnessing an increase in extreme weather events – hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves, wildfires and all the rest. It emphatically counters the claim that current temperatures and levels of atmospheric CO2 are unusually and worryingly high. On the contrary, it is very clearly the case, as can be seen in all mainstream studies, that, compared to the last half billion years of earth’s history, both current temperatures and CO2 levels are extremely and unusually low. We are currently in an ice age. It also shows that there is no evidence that changing levels of CO2 (it has changed many times) has ever ‘driven’ climate change in the past.
.
Why then, are we told, again and again, that ‘catastrophic man-made climate-change’ is an irrefutable fact? Why are we told that there is no evidence that contradicts it? Why are we told that anyone who questions ‘climate chaos’ is a ‘flat-earther’ and a ‘science-denier’?
.
The film explores the nature of the consensus behind climate change. It describes the origins of the climate funding bandwagon, and the rise of the trillion-dollar climate industry. It describes the hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the climate crisis. It explains the enormous pressure on scientists and others not to question the climate alarm: the withdrawal of funds, rejection by science journals, social ostracism.
.
But the climate alarm is much more than a funding and jobs bandwagon. The film explores the politics of climate. From the beginning, the climate scare was political. The culprit was free-market industrial capitalism. The solution was higher taxes and more regulation. From the start, the climate alarm appealed to, and has been adopted and promoted by, those groups who favour bigger government.
.
This is the unspoken political divide behind the climate alarm. The climate scare appeals especially to all those in the sprawling publicly-funded establishment. This includes the largely publicly-funded Western intelligentsia, for whom climate has become a moral cause. In these circles, to criticise or question the climate alarm has become a breach of social etiquette.
.
The film was shot on location in the U.S., Israel, Kenya and UK.
.
MARTIN DURKIN
Video here.
From the description:
Hugh Ross is a Canadian astrophysicist. He obtained his Ph.D. in astronomy from the University of Toronto and his B.Sc. degree in physics from the University of British Columbia. He established his own ministry in 1986, called Reasons to Believe.