Writes James Lyons-Weiler:
All COVID-19 Vaccine Studies Used nonQ-RT-PCR to determine case status. All of the estimates of outcome are unreliable. This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.
Read on here.
Category Archives: Covid
If You Get More Doses, You Put Others at Higher Risk
The Cleveland Clinic Study is Now Published as Peer Reviewed Science
Writes James Lyons-Weiler:
Finally, after peer review, the Cleveland clinic study that report that “The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19” has been properly published.
“Risk of COVID-19… increased with time since most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.’
Continue here.
Like the Curious Bride in “Bluebeard”
Investigating the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex leads inexorably to a place of horror.
Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH says he has found strong indicators of “eminent Scripps Institute virologist, Kristian Andersen”, changing his tune on the possibility of the Covid virus having been engineered. On 31st January 2020 he still thought parts of the genome “(potentially) look engineered”. Then, on 4th February 2020, “shortly after a phone conference with Dr. Fauci and others—Dr. Andersen completely changed his tune. By then, the decision had been to submit a letter to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine regarding the origin of SARS-CoV-2.”
For more than a year thereafter, anyone suggesting an artificial, lab-engineered source of the virus was vilified mercilessly in the press. Then suddenly and strangely, it became an allowed opinion. Despite however the enormity of this suggestion, the media are strangely silent about it.
McCollough comments:
What on earth could inspire a virologist to adopt a posture of such Machiavellian duplicity about an infectious agent that—as he well knew—was about to inflict a catastrophe on all of mankind? He had to have known that such pronouncements—coming from a virologist of his eminence—would likely retard a thorough and impartial investigation of the virus’s origin.
Contemplating this question this evening, I thought Bluebeard’s young bride when she discovers the chamber of horrors in her husband’s castle. I suspect that Tess Lawrie felt the same way in her encounter with Dr. Andrew Hill, which she recounted in the short documentary film Dear Andy.
I have blogged about that documentary film here.
Countries with high Covid vaccine hesitancy. What were the outcomes?
The example of Papua-New Guinea
Very interesting video (17 min). Vaccine uptake was some 4 % (!), but they had very few Covid deaths. They were also, in a separate health program, taking Ivermectin at the time …
“Can you name >5 unvaxxed Amish who died from COVID?”
Why not? They are "supposed to be" dying in droves!
Writes Steve Kirsch:
The Amish didn’t lockdown, social distance, mask, or take a vaccine. It was business as usual. Few died. I offered $2,500 for anyone who could name >5 Amish who died. No takers. Just excuses.
Update (video, see also text here): The Amish followed none of the guidelines, didn’t vaccinate etc. And had, according to Steve Kirsch, an at least 90% lower death rate from Covid.
The real “misinformation” peddlers
Here’s someone the BBC in its zeal to root out “mis- and disinformation” surprisingly missed.
From Tom Woods‘ newsletter from today:
| If the world would stop being insane for five minutes, I could get things done around here. Howard Forman, a prime spreader of Covid misinformation at Yale, just posted this: |
 |
| Apoorva Mandavilli, the woman in the picture, spread nonstop misinformation about Covid via her New York Times columns, exaggerating the numbers and death rate to the point that even the Times itself had to correct her. She claimed without evidence that schools were especially dangerous sources of illness. She also said it was “racist” to consider the origins of Covid. It was nonstop lies and lunacy from her pen — and now a Yale professor endorses her as someone qualified to fight against medical misinformation. Sometimes I wonder if the absurdity of it all is deliberate, and intended to demoralize us. At any rate, the comments slightly restored my faith in mankind. There were many, many of them, and as far as I can see they were all from people aghast at this. Examples: |
 |
 |
 |
| The great Harvey Risch is at Yale, so I hate to say that everyone from Yale obviously needs to be ignored at this point, but let’s say everyone except Harvey Risch. “Misinformation,” whether medical or otherwise, has obviously come to mean: information we don’t want you to have. Another thing a lot of these people didn’t want you to have was, you know, a job — unless they decided you were “essential.” So maybe it’s not such a bad idea to have something in your back pocket for in case they come after us again. |
The truth about the BBC’s war on ‘disinformation’
The new BBC Verify project reflects the cultural elites’ paranoid fear of free speech.
Article by Fraser Myers
The BBC not only inflates the dangers of social-media falsehoods, it has also applied the disinformation label to stories that are actually true. So if you cause a fuss about anti-car traffic restrictions coming to your local area, if you protest against eco-plans for a ‘15-minute city’, you could find yourself branded a ‘conspiracy theorist’ on the BBC – even though these illiberal traffic schemes really are happening across the UK. All too often, the charge of ‘disinformation’ is used as another way of demonising those with dissent opinions.
Meanwhile, the BBC has been known to spread untruths of its own. Take its coverage of the trans issue. The BBC website regularly describes predatory men, including rapists, paedophiles and murderers, as ‘women’ – purely because they ‘identify’ as such. It has produced news reports and whole documentaries about ‘men’ getting pregnant. When licence-fee payers are told to ignore the evidence of their own eyes in this way, we shouldn’t be surprised that the BBC is losing trust.
Climate change is another major blindspot for the Beeb. Despite their apparent concern about climate misinformation, BBC journalists and presenters frequently make alarmist and false claims about the environment. A recent Panorama documentary, fronted by the BBC’s climate editor, said in its opening sequence that extreme weather events are killing more people. The truth is the precise opposite: the death toll from weather events has actually fallen considerably in recent decades. But this does not fit the established, fear-driven narrative.
[Links to various other websites in the original text.]
Poll: What parishioners want from their churches
In Germany
They don’t want their churches supporting “Extinction Rebellion” or similar groups. Only 17 percent supported that policy, 50 percent were against. The rest either said they don’t care (18 percent) or didn’t know (12 percent) or declined to answer (3 percent).
56 percent said the churches should concentrate more on their spiritual and pastoral tasks.
51 percent supported the fact that the churches appealed to everyone to get vaccinated against covid.
However, only 43 percent (a relative majority) thought closing churches during lockdown was a good idea (30 percent disagreed)
15 percent say they are definitely going to leave the church, a further 21 percent say they are considering leaving.
The relevant article is here.
Propaganda madness and hysteria
Trying to promote the covid vaccine
The last quote is best, because it’s so ironic: “If only there was a vaccine against BS!”
See video here.
The Beethoven sonata accompaniment is gold.