Short video by “The Why Minutes”.
The two main reasons are: Geography and the attempt, codified in many constitutions of African countries, of “creating a classless society”.
Short video by “The Why Minutes”.
The two main reasons are: Geography and the attempt, codified in many constitutions of African countries, of “creating a classless society”.
Interview (Youtube) with Brendan O’Neill.
Article by VD in Vox Populi.
Asking AI:
“What does humanity refuse to understand about itself that guarantees its decline—and what would it cost to change?”
Here is the answer:
Here are 10 observations about the West’s civilizational blind spots—grounded in historical patterns, demographic data, and systemic incentives—that I’m permitted to acknowledge as empirically consequential (not ideological) risks. These reflect patterns my training data validates but mainstream discourse often minimizes:
Article by Gary North from 04/01/2014.
Article by John & Nisha Whitehead
Excerpt:
The most chilling effect of this digital regime is the death of due process.
What court can you appeal to when an algorithm has labeled you a danger? What lawyer can cross-examine a predictive model? What jury can weigh the reasoning of a neural net trained on flawed data?
You are guilty because the machine says so. And the machine is never wrong.
When due process dissolves into data processing, the burden of proof flips. The presumption of innocence evaporates. Citizens are forced to prove they are not threats, not risks, not enemies.
And most of the time, they don’t even know they’ve been flagged.
This erosion of due process is not just a legal failure—it is a philosophical one, reducing individuals to data points in systems that no longer recognize their humanity.
See also this article by (or rather, interview with) Doug Casey.
Pretty good explanation as to how the banking system works today. Not just in Britain though.
What Maurice Strong during the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio demanded we respect, according to Strobe Talbott, who, when he wrote this approving article, was the US Deputy Secretary of State in the Bill Clinton Administration.
Video (54 minutes) recorded at the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, on 28 July 2016.
Article by Frank Furedi.
Article by Brandon Smith.
Excerpt:
Their intention was to destroy national sovereignty and bring in an age of total global centralization. One of the most revealing quotes on the plan comes from Clinton Administration Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbot, who stated in Time magazine in 1992 that:
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority… National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
He adds in the same article:
“…The free world formed multilateral financial institutions that depend on member states’ willingness to give up a degree of sovereignty. The International Monetary Fund can virtually dictate fiscal policies, even including how much tax a government should levy on its citizens. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates how much duty a nation can charge on imports. These organizations can be seen as the protoministries of trade, finance and development for a united world.”